At the time of this publication, seasonal precipitation is near normal for most of the region. May precipitation was below average in the Upper Green and Duchense river basins, and was near average in the Yampa/White and Lower Green river basins. Snowpack is past the seasonal peaks. Median June water supply forecasts stayed the same in the Yampa/White and Duchense river basins, and dropped slighty in the Upper and Lower Green river basins.

-Model Soil Moisture/Observed Streamflow...The November soil moisture conditions were much below average in the Upper Green River basin. This was most likely due to prolonged dry conditions within the basin over the last nine years. Observed streamflow for the month of May was 70 percent of average.

-Snowpack/Precipitation...On June 1st, the basinwide snowpack was 50 percent of average. However, the upper part of the basin, above 10,000 feet in elevation, is not gaged. Therefore, the actual basinwide snowpack may be greater than reported. In the Upper Green River basin, May precipitation was 75 percent of average. However, because previous months have received above average precipitation, the seasonal precipitation is average at this time.

-Short Term Precipitation Forecast...As of June 8th, meteorological models were predicting increased chances for below normal temperatures and above normal precipitation through the middle of June.

-General Discussion...Most of the April through July volume forecasts stayed the same or decreased slightly from the May 1st issuance and indicate below average to near average runoff volumes for points above Flaming Gorge. The June-July volume forecasts for Fontenelle Reservoir and Flaming Gorge Reservoir inflows are essentially the same percentage-wise as the April-July volume forecasts.

-Model Soil Moisture/Observed Streamflow...Fall soil moisture estimates were near average in the headwaters of the Yampa and White River basin. Soil moisture deficits are not adversely effecting model guidance as much as in other regions. While the overall monthly average maximum temperatures during May in the Yampa and White River basin were near normal, the monthly average minimum temperatures were significally above average. In addition scattered thunderstorms during the last ten days of the month helped to keep flows up when the temperatures dropped. Therefore, observed streamflow for the month of May was 130 precent of average.

-Snowpack/Precipitation...On June 1st, the basinwide snowpack was 35 percent of average. May precipitation was 95 precent of average. The seasonal precipitation is average at this time.

-Short Term Precipitation Forecast...As of June 8th, meteorological models were predicting increased chances for below normal temperatures and above normal precipitation through the middle of June.

-General Discussion...The April through July volume forecasts decreased from the May 1st issuance and now the guidance indicate runoff volumes from average to above average for the Yampa and White River basin. Given the significant runoff in May and low June 1st snowpack, the June-July volume forecasts percentage-wise are much lower ranging from 56 percent of average for the White River near Watson to 92 percentage of average for the Little Snake River near Dixon.

-Model Soil Moisture/Observed Streamflow...Fall soil conditions in the Duchesne were similar to the Upper Green with many basins indicating much below average conditions. While the overall monthly average maximum temperatures during May in the Duchesne River basin were near normal, the monthly average minimum temperatures were significally above average. Therefore, observed streamflow for the month of May was 130 percent of average.

-Snowpack/Precipitation...The snowpack in the Duchesne River basin on June 1st was essentially depleted. May precipitation was 85 percent of average. However, because previous months have received above average precipitation, the seasonal precipitation is average at this time.

-Short Term Precipitation Forecast...As of June 8th, meteorological models were predicting increased chances for below normal temperatures and above normal precipitation through the middle of June.

-General Discussion...Most of the April through July volume forecasts stayed the same as the May 1st issuance; however, a few increased and a few decreased reflecting the diverse conditions within the basin. These forecasts range from average in the headwaters of the basin to much below average at downstream locations. Percentage-wise, the June-July volume forecasts are much lower given that the snowpack is depleted.

-Model Soil Moisture/Observed Streamflow...The November soil moisture conditions were much below average in the Lower Green River basin and continues to drive lower model guidance. Observed streamflows for the months of February, March, and April were below average. While the overall monthly average maximum temperatures during May in the Lower Green River basin were near normal, the monthly average minimum temperatures were significally above average. Therefore, observed streamflow for the month of May was 120 percent of average.

-Snowpack/Precipitation...The Lower Green River basin snowpack was 15 percent of average on June 1st. May precipitation was 110 percent of average. However, because previous months have received below average precipitation, the seasonal precipitation is average at this time.

-Short Term Precipitation Forecast...As of June 8th, meteorological models were predicting increased chances for below normal temperatures and above normal precipitation through the middle of June.

-General Discussion...Most of the April through July volume forecasts stayed the same as the May 1st issuance with the forecasts ranging from below average to near average with the exception of Ferron Creek forecasted at much below average. Percentage-wise, the June-July volume forecasts are much lower given that the snowpack is almost depleted.

Differences between the full period forecasts and the residual forecasts may not exactly equal the actual observed volumes due to rounding conventions (see Definitions section).

10% exceedance forecast: Given the current hydrometeorological conditions, i.e current snowpack, soil moisture and streamflow, the volume that has a 10% chance of being exceeded. Previously referred to as "Reasonable Maximum Forecast".

50% exceedance forecast: Given the current hydrometeorological conditions, i.e current snowpack, soil moisture and streamflow, the volume that has a 50% chance of being exceeded. Previously referred to as "Most Probable Forecast".

90% exceedance forecast: Given the current hydrometeorological conditions, i.e current snowpack, soil moisture and streamflow, the volume that has a 90% chance of being exceeded. Previously referred to as "Reasonable Minimum Forecast".

Acre-Foot (af): The volume equal to one acre covered one foot deep (43,560 cubic feet). See kaf below.

Average: The arithmetic mean. The sum of the values divided by the number of values. Values from 1971-2000 are used for this publication.

Categories: Much Above Average=Greater than 130%, Above Average=111-130%, Near Average=90-110%, Below Average=70-89%, Much Below Average=Less than 70%.

CBRFC: Colorado Basin River Forecast Center.

Forecast Period: The period from April 1 through July 31, unless otherwise noted.

kaf: Thousand Acre-Feet. See Acre-Foot above.

Inflow: The volume of water that flows into a reservoir or lake.

Median: The middle value of an ordered set of values. Half of the values are higher and half of the values are lower. When the set contains an even number of values the median is the average of the two middle numbers.

NOAA: National Oceanic and Atomospheric Administration.

NWS: National Weather Service.

Water supply forecasts take into consideration present hydrometeorological conditions and use average basin temperatures and precipitation for the forecast period. As the forecast season progresses, a greater portion of the future hydrologic and climatic uncertainty becomes known and monthly forecasts become more accurate. For more information on the tools we use, consult Water Supply Forecasting Tools.

Volume forecasts represent adjusted flows; that is, observed flows with upstream water use taken into account. Adjusted flows will closely approximate natural or unimpaired flows. However, not all upstream diversions or impoundments are measured or quantifiable. For specific adjustments used with each forecast point, consult the Guide to Water Supply Forecasting.

The Water Supply Outlook is issued monthly January through May by the Colorado Basin River Forecast Center. It represents a coordinated effort between the National Weather Service, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Geological Survey and local water district managers.

Note: Data used in this report are provisional and are subject to revision.

For more information, or to be included on the mailing list, please contact:

Colorado Basin River Forecast Center
2242 W North Temple
Salt Lake City, UT 84116
(801) 524-5130
www.cbrfc.noaa.gov