New 1981-2010 Averages being used this year.
Note: This publication is currently undergoing major revisions. The current publication will be replaced with a new publication based on stakeholder requirements and scientific advances. We expect to begin sharing details on this soon. If you have input on content, format, or publication frequency at any time, please contact us at cbrfc.webmasters@noaa.gov.San Juan Water Supply Outlook, June 1, 2012

San Juan Water Supply Outlook, June 1, 2012


Prepared by Greg Smith
NOAA, National Weather Service
Colorado Basin River Forecast Center
Salt Lake City, Utah
www.cbrfc.noaa.gov

Contents

San Juan Summary






*Median of forecasts within each basin.


San Juan Basin Conditions

The following conditions influenced this month's forecasts:

Precipitation:
Seasonal October through May precipitation was between 65 to 85 percent of average at most locations in the San Juan Basin.

May was the third consecutive month with very dry conditions. Precipitation in May ranged from 0 to near 55 percent of average over most of the San Juan Basin. The Basin average from the month of May was 25% of average.

Snow:
Snow melted off at measuring sites by early June. The warm and dry spring caused snow to melt out a full 4 to 6 weeks early at many locations.

Animas River Basin Snow Plot.

San Juan Basin (above Navajo Reservoir) Snow Plot.

Streamflow:
Streamflow volumes were much below average in May due to the lack of snow. Runoff volumes in May ranged from 40 to 60 percent of average.

Soil Moisture:
Modeled soil moisture was near to above average at highest elevations entering the winter season. Below average soil moisture conditions existed over the southern half of the basin and in tributaries further downstream.

Climate Forecasts:
La Nina climate conditions existed through the winter months. The La Nina climate condition suggests drier than average conditions possible over the San Juan Basin. The La Nina climate condition was considered when developing the forecasts.

Forecast Summary:
The 2012 season was defined by very dry and warm conditions that persisted throughout the spring that resulted in a very early snow melt. At times during the spring the snow pack was at record or near record low levels due to the dry and warm conditions. Runoff volume forecasts were reduced as the season progressed and the dry conditions persisted. Forecasts have been reduced slightly from those issued in early May and some are in the bottom 5 of the historical record. April-July runoff volumes are expected to range from 35 to 55 percent of the 1981-2010 average. June-July runoff volumes volumes are expected to range from near 10 to 30 percent of average.



* Percent usable capacity, not percent average contents.
Click for multi-month Graph.



Differences between the full period forecasts and the residual forecasts may not exactly equal the actual observed volumes due to rounding conventions (see Definitions section).

Reservoir Monthly Inflow Forecasts







Monthly Streamflows



Precipitation Maps








Hydrologist: Greg Smith