Note: This publication is currently undergoing major revisions. The current publication will be replaced with a new publication based on stakeholder requirements and scientific advances. We expect to begin sharing details on this soon. If you have input on content, format, or publication frequency at any time, please contact us at cbrfc.webmasters@noaa.gov.Great Basin Water Supply Outlook, April 1, 2010

Great Basin Water Supply Outlook, April 1, 2010


Prepared by B.Bernard
NOAA, National Weather Service
Colorado Basin River Forecast Center
Salt Lake City, Utah
www.cbrfc.noaa.gov

Contents

Great Basin Summary






*Median of forecasts within each basin.


Bear Basin Conditions

The following conditions influenced this month's forecasts:

Precipitation:
Seasonal October through March precipitation was near 66 percent of average in the upper Bear Basin as a whole. March precipitation was 61 percent of average.

Streamflow:
Bear River Streamflow at Stewart Dam was 36 percent of average for March. The Logan River above State Dam was 66 percent of average for March.

Snowpack:
April 1st snow water equivalent was 58 percent of average for the Bear Basin as a whole.


Upper Bear River Basin Snow Plot.
Bear River Below Woodruff Narrows Reservoir Snow Plot.
Bear River Basin Snow Plot.

Soil Moisture:
Modeled Soil Moisture, click on map to zoom.

Climate Forecasts:
Climate forecasts were not factored into the northern Utah forecasts because there is not a strong correlation between El Nino conditions and winter precipitation.

Forecast Summary:
April 1st snow water equivalent values are below average. As a result, the April through July streamflow volume forecasts remain much below average with little change from last months numbers. These forecasts now range between 17 and 58 percent of average with a median value of 40 percent of average.



* Percent usable capacity, not percent average contents.
Click for multi-month Graph.

Weber Basin Conditions

The following conditions influenced this month's forecasts:

Precipitation:
Seasonal October through March precipitation was near 64 percent of average in the Weber Basin. March precipitation was 60 percent of average.

Streamflow:
Rockport Reservoir inflow recorded 77 percent of average.

Snowpack:
April 1st snow water equivalent was near 65 percent of average in the basin as a whole.

Weber River Basin Snow Plot.
Upper Weber River Basin Snow Plot.

Soil Moisture:
Modeled Soil Moisture, click on map to zoom.

Climate Forecasts:
Climate forecasts were not a factored into the northern Utah forecasts because there is not a strong correlation between El Nino conditions and winter precipitation.

Forecast Summary:
Due to continued much below average seasonal precipitation and still below average April 1st snow water equivalent values, the April through July streamflow volume forecasts were lowered to much below average. However, a week of very wet weather since April 1st may result in a moderate rise in Weber Basin forecasts in subsequent updates. These forecasts now range between 24 and 57 percent of average with a median value of 41 percent of average.



* Percent usable capacity, not percent average contents.
Click for multi-month Graph.

Six Creeks Basin Conditions

The following conditions influenced this month's forecasts:

Precipitation:
Seasonal October through March precipitation was near 73 percent of average. March precipitation was 60 percent of average.

Streamflow:
Big Cottonwood Creek streamflow was 77 percent of average during March.

Snowpack:
April 1st snow water equivalent was near 75 percent of average in the basin as a whole.

Six Creeks River Basin Snow Plot.

Soil Moisture:
Modeled Soil Moisture, click on map to zoom.

Climate Forecasts:
Climate forecasts were not factored into the northern Utah forecasts because there is not a strong correlation between El Nino conditions and winter precipitation.

Forecast Summary:
As of April 1st, seasonal precipitation remains much below normal. As a result, April through July streamflow forecasts remain similar to last month. However, a week of very wet weather since April 1st may result in a moderate rise in Six Creeks Basin forecasts in subsequent updates. Currently, the forecasts range between 31 and 68 percent of average with a median value of 54 percent of average.



* Percent usable capacity, not percent average contents.
Click for multi-month Graph.

Utah Lake Basin Conditions

The following conditions influenced this month's forecasts:

Precipitation:
Seasonal October thought March precipitation was 68 percent of average. March precipitation was 77 percent of average.

Streamflow:
March streamflow was 61 percent of average for the Provo at Woodland.

Snowpack:
April 1st snow water equivalent for Utah Lake was near 68 percent of average in the basin as a whole.

Provo River, Utah Lake Basin Snow Plot.

Soil Moisture:
Modeled Soil Moisture, click on map to zoom.

Climate Forecasts:
Climate forecasts were not factored into the northern Utah forecasts because there is not a strong correlation between El Nino conditions and winter precipitation here.

Forecast Summary:
Due to below average April 1st snow water equivalent values the April through July streamflow volume forecasts remained much below average. The forecasts now range between 38 and 64 percent of average with a median value of 50 percent of average.



* Percent usable capacity, not percent average contents.
Click for multi-month Graph.


Bear Specific Site Forecasts (kaf)

Click site name for graph.
Forecast
Period
90%
Exceedance
Volume
50%
Exceedance
Volume
Percent
Average
10%
Exceedance
Volume
Bear
UtahApril-July53655883
Woodruff Narrows Res *April-July47604491
Montpelier, Nr, Stewart Dam, Blo *April-July25401772
Big Ck
Randolph, Nr April-July0.452423.6
Smiths Fork
Border, Nr April-July32484764
Logan
Logan, Nr, State Dam, Abv April-July41504062
Blacksmith Fork
Hyrum, Nr, Upnl Dam, Abv April-July17194024
Little Bear
Paradise April-July12153322

*Regulated Forecast, i.e. Observed flow uncorrected for upstream diversion.

Weber Specific Site Forecasts (kaf)

Click site name for graph.
Forecast
Period
90%
Exceedance
Volume
50%
Exceedance
Volume
Percent
Average
10%
Exceedance
Volume
Weber
Oakley, Nr April-July60705791
Rockport Res, Wanship, Nr April-July54685195
Coalville, Nr April-July43574176
Chalk Ck
Coalville April-July12173828
Weber
Echo Res, Echo, At April-July587441111
Lost Ck
Lost Ck Res, Croydon, Nr April-July34.2247
East Canyon Ck
Jeremy Ranch, Nr April-July2.15.74010.4
East Canyon Res, Morgan, Nr April-July10134218
Weber
Gateway April-July9012535195
Sf Ogden
Huntsville, Nr April-July14203131
Ogden
Pineview Res, Ogden, Nr April-July29382962
Wheeler Ck
Huntsville, Nr April-July0.52324.8
Centerville Ck
Centerville,nr, Div,abv April-July0.330.4230.86


Six Creeks Specific Site Forecasts (kaf)

Click site name for graph.
Forecast
Period
90%
Exceedance
Volume
50%
Exceedance
Volume
Percent
Average
10%
Exceedance
Volume
Little Cottonwood Ck
Salt Lake City, Nr April-July23276833
Big Cottonwood Ck
Salt Lake City, Nr April-July19246331
Mill Ck
Salt Lake City, Nr April-July2.83.8545.1
Dell Fk
Little Dell Res April-July2.12.9434.6
Parleys Ck
Salt Lake City, Nr April-July5.674210.9
Emigration Ck
Salt Lake City, Nr April-July11.4312.1
City Ck
Salt Lake City, Nr April-July44.5526
Vernon Ck
Vernon, Nr April-June0.21682
S Willow Ck
Grantsville, Nr April-July1.22.3723.4
Dunn Ck
Park Valley, Nr April-July0.21.1353.4


Utah Lake Specific Site Forecasts (kaf)

Click site name for graph.
Forecast
Period
90%
Exceedance
Volume
50%
Exceedance
Volume
Percent
Average
10%
Exceedance
Volume
Spanish Fork
Castilla, Nr April-July30344441
Provo
Woodland, Nr April-July53666484
Hailstone, Nr April-July49635881
Deer Ck Res April-July52635087
American Fork
American Fork, Nr, Up Pwrplnt, AbvApril-July13165021
West Canyon Ck
Cedar Fort, Nr April-July0.71.2522.2
Salt Ck
Nephi April-July2.35387.7
Jordan
Utah Lake, Provo, Nr April-July12716048215

Differences between the full period forecasts and the residual forecasts may not exactly equal the actual observed volumes due to rounding conventions (see Definitions section).

Great Basin End of Month Reservoir Contents (kaf)

Usable
Capacity
EOM
Contents
Percent
Usable
Capacity
Last Year
EOM
Last Year
%Capacity
untitled Bear
Woodruff Narrows Res 55.8 51.0 91 52.4 94
untitled Bear River
Bear Lake, Nr Lifton 1302.0 449.4 35 293.5 23
untitled Little Bear
Hyrum Res Abv 15.3 14.9 98 12.1 79
untitled Willard Reservoir Storage
215.0 182.1 85 141.4 66
untitled Sf Ogden
Causey Res 7.1 5.9 83 4.1 57
untitled Ogden
Pineview Res, Ogden, Nr 110.1 71.3 65 53.7 49
untitled Lost Ck
Lost Ck Res, Croydon, Nr 22.5 17.1 76 16.8 75
untitled Weber
Rockport Res, Wanship, Nr 60.9 52.7 87 49.9 82
Echo Res, Echo, At 73.9 61.2 83 58.8 80
untitled East Canyon Ck
East Canyon Res, Morgan, Nr 49.5 41.2 83 41.1 83
untitled Dell Fk
Little Dell Res 20.5 14.4 70 13.2 64
untitled Mountain Dell Dam
3.0 1.9 63 1.9 63
untitled Jordanelle Dam
311.0 225.3 72 228.7 74
untitled Provo
Deer Ck Res 149.7 147.6 99 134.5 90
untitled Jordan
Utah Lake, Provo, Nr 870.9 860.0 99 842.8 97
untitled
TOTAL 3267.2 2196.0 67 1944.9 60

Precipitation Maps




Definitions

10% exceedance forecast: Given the current hydrometeorological conditions, i.e current snowpack, soil moisture and streamflow, the volume that has a 10% chance of being exceeded. Previously referred to as "Reasonable Maximum Forecast".

50% exceedance forecast: Given the current hydrometeorological conditions, i.e current snowpack, soil moisture and streamflow, the volume that has a 50% chance of being exceeded. Previously referred to as "Most Probable Forecast".

90% exceedance forecast: Given the current hydrometeorological conditions, i.e current snowpack, soil moisture and streamflow, the volume that has a 90% chance of being exceeded. Previously referred to as "Reasonable Minimum Forecast".

Acre-Foot (af): The volume equal to one acre covered one foot deep (43,560 cubic feet). See kaf below.

Average: The arithmetic mean. The sum of the values divided by the number of values. Values from 1971-2000 are used for this publication.

Categories: Much Above Average=Greater than 130%, Above Average=111-130%, Near Average=90-110%, Below Average=70-89%, Much Below Average=Less than 70%.

CBRFC: Colorado Basin River Forecast Center.

Forecast Period: The period from April 1 through July 31, unless otherwise noted.

kaf: Thousand Acre-Feet. See Acre-Foot above.

Inflow: The volume of water that flows into a reservoir or lake.

Median: The middle value of an ordered set of values. Half of the values are higher and half of the values are lower. When the set contains an even number of values the median is the average of the two middle numbers.

NOAA: National Oceanic and Atomospheric Administration.

NWS: National Weather Service.

Rounding Conventions:
RangeRound to
0-1.990.01
2.0-19.90.1
20-1991.0
200-9995.0
1000+3 significant digits


Streamflow: The volume of water that flows past a specific stream site.

Water Year: The 12-month period, October 1 through September 30. The water year is designated by the calendar year in which it ends. Thus, the year ending September 30, 2008, is called the "2008 water year."


Additional Information

Water supply forecasts take into consideration present hydrometeorological conditions and use average basin temperatures and precipitation for the forecast period. As the forecast season progresses, a greater portion of the future hydrologic and climatic uncertainty becomes known and monthly forecasts become more accurate. For more information on the tools we use, consult Water Supply Forecasting Tools.

Volume forecasts represent adjusted flows; that is, observed flows with upstream water use taken into account. Adjusted flows will closely approximate natural or unimpaired flows. However, not all upstream diversions or impoundments are measured or quantifiable. For specific adjustments used with each forecast point, consult the Guide to Water Supply Forecasting.

The Water Supply Outlook is issued monthly January through May by the Colorado Basin River Forecast Center. It represents a coordinated effort between the National Weather Service, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Geological Survey and local water district managers.

Note: Data used in this report are provisional and are subject to revision.

For more information, or to be included on the mailing list, please contact:

Colorado Basin River Forecast Center
2242 W North Temple
Salt Lake City, UT 84116
(801) 524-5130
www.cbrfc.noaa.gov


Hydrologist: B.Bernard