Note: This publication is currently undergoing major revisions. The current publication will be replaced with a new publication based on stakeholder requirements and scientific advances. We expect to begin sharing details on this soon. If you have input on content, format, or publication frequency at any time, please contact us at cbrfc.webmasters@noaa.gov.Great Basin Water Supply Outlook, May 1, 2010

Great Basin Water Supply Outlook, May 1, 2010


Prepared by B.Bernard
NOAA, National Weather Service
Colorado Basin River Forecast Center
Salt Lake City, Utah
www.cbrfc.noaa.gov

Contents

Great Basin Summary






*Median of forecasts within each basin.


Bear Basin Conditions

The following conditions influenced this month's forecasts:

Precipitation:
Seasonal October through April precipitation was near 77 percent of average in the upper Bear Basin. April precipitation was 139 percent of average.

Streamflow:
The Bear River at stateline recorded 128 percent of average streamflow. The Logan River above State Dam recorded 64 percent of average streamflow.

Snowpack:
May 1st snow water equivalent was 64 percent of average for the Bear Basin as a whole.


Upper Bear River Basin Snow Plot.
Bear River Below Woodruff Narrows Reservoir Snow Plot.
Bear River Basin Snow Plot.

Soil Moisture:
Modeled Soil Moisture, click on map to zoom.

Climate Forecasts:
Climate forecasts were not a factored into the northern Utah forecasts because there is not a strong correlation between El Nino conditions and winter precipitation.

Forecast Summary:
Wet and cool April conditions improved this months water supply forecasts by 16 percent over last months median forecast. April through July seasonal volume forecasts now range between 25 and 79 percent of average with a median forecast volume of 56 percent of average. The residual forecast volumes for May through July range from 27 to 79 percent of average with a median forecast volume of 46 percent of average.



* Percent usable capacity, not percent average contents.
Click for multi-month Graph.

Weber Basin Conditions

The following conditions influenced this month's forecasts:

Precipitation:
Seasonal October through April precipitation was 76 percent of average in the Weber Basin. April precipitation was 140 percent of average.

Streamflow:
The Weber at Oakley recorded 67 percent of average streamflow.

Snowpack:
May 1st snow water equivalent was 73 percent of average for the Weber and Ogden River Basins.

Weber River Basin Snow Plot.
Upper Weber River Basin Snow Plot.

Soil Moisture:
Modeled Soil Moisture, click on map to zoom.

Climate Forecasts:
Climate forecasts were not a factored into the northern Utah forecasts because there is not a strong correlation between El Nino conditions and winter precipitation.

Forecast Summary:
Wet and cool April conditions have improved this months water supply forecasts by 26 percent over last months median forecast volume. April through July seasonal volume forecasts now range between 25 and 74 percent of average with a median forecast volume of 65 percent of average. The residual forecast volumes for May through July range from 43 to 74 percent of average with a median forecast volume of 63 percent of average.



* Percent usable capacity, not percent average contents.
Click for multi-month Graph.

Six Creeks Basin Conditions

The following conditions influenced this month's forecasts:

Precipitation:
Seasonal October through April precipitation was near 87 percent of average. April precipitation was 154 percent of average.

Streamflow:
Big Cottonwood Creek recorded 70 percent of average streamflow.

Snowpack:
May 1st snow water equivalent was 89 percent of average for Six Creeks Basin.

Six Creeks River Basin Snow Plot.

Big and Little Cottonwood Canyons Snow Plot.

Soil Moisture:
Modeled Soil Moisture, click on map to zoom.

Climate Forecasts:
Climate forecasts were not factored into the northern Utah forecasts because there is not a strong correlation between El Nino conditions and winter precipitation.

Forecast Summary:
Six Creeks water supply conditions improved by 5 percent over last months median forecast volume. April through July seasonal volume forecasts now range between 46 and 85 percent of average with a median forecast of 65 percent of average. The residual forecast volumes for May through July range from 48 to 82 percent of average with a median forecast volume of 69 percent of average.



* Percent usable capacity, not percent average contents.
Click for multi-month Graph.

Utah Lake Basin Conditions

The following conditions influenced this month's forecasts:

Precipitation:
Seasonal October thought April precipitation was 77 percent of average. April precipitation was 136 percent of average.

Streamflow:
April streamflow was 65 percent of average for the Provo at Woodland.

Snowpack:
May 1st snow water equivalent for Utah Lake was near 62 percent of average in the basin as a whole, not including the Jordan River and Six Creeks.

Provo River, Utah Lake Basin Snow Plot.

Soil Moisture:
Modeled Soil Moisture, click on map to zoom.

Climate Forecasts:
Climate forecasts were not factored into the northern Utah forecasts because there is not a strong correlation between El Nino conditions and winter precipitation here.

Forecast Summary:
Wet and cool April conditions improved water supply conditions by 18 percent over last months median forecast volume. April through July seasonal volume forecasts now range between 38 and 70 percent of average with a median forecast volume of 68 percent of average, up 18 percent from last month. The residual forecast volumes for May through July range from 45 to 71 percent of average with a median forecast volume of 65 percent of average.



* Percent usable capacity, not percent average contents.
Click for multi-month Graph.


Bear Specific Site Forecasts (kaf)

Click site name for graph.
Forecast
Period
90%
Exceedance
Volume
50%
Exceedance
Volume
Percent
Average
10%
Exceedance
Volume
Bear
UtahApril-July758979101
May-July72848197
Woodruff Narrows Rsvr, Abv April-July708873101
May-July55737086
Montpelier, Nr, Stewart Dam, Blo *April-July40603381
May-July31503471
Big Ck
Randolph, Nr April-July1.22.8583.8
May-July0.92.5583.5
Smiths Fork
Border, Nr April-July45586569
May-July38516462
Logan
Logan, Nr, State Dam, Abv April-July61706379
May-July51606369
Blacksmith Fork
Hyrum, Nr, Upnl Dam, Abv April-July21245627
May-July16185821
Little Bear
Paradise April-July15183822
May-July8.7113415.2

*Regulated Forecast, i.e. Observed flow uncorrected for upstream diversion.



Six Creeks Specific Site Forecasts (kaf)

Click site name for graph.
Forecast
Period
90%
Exceedance
Volume
50%
Exceedance
Volume
Percent
Average
10%
Exceedance
Volume
Little Cottonwood Ck
Salt Lake City, Nr April-July28328437
May-July25308635
Big Cottonwood Ck
Salt Lake City, Nr April-July25298137
May-July22268133
Mill Ck
Salt Lake City, Nr April-July3.44.2665.5
May-July2.93.6674.9
Dell Fk
Little Dell Res April-July3.13.7674.8
May-July2.63.2824.3
Parleys Ck
Salt Lake City, Nr April-July7.696311.4
May-July5.77669.4
Emigration Ck
Salt Lake City, Nr April-July1.72.1532.8
May-July1.11.5562.2
City Ck
Salt Lake City, Nr April-July4.65.4706.7
May-July3.84.6715.9
Vernon Ck
Vernon, Nr April-June0.4101.1
May-June0.20.801.6
S Willow Ck
Grantsville, Nr April-July2.22.7873.4
May-July1.82.3853
Dunn Ck
Park Valley, Nr April-July0.31.5483.8
May-July0.11.3463.6


Utah Lake Specific Site Forecasts (kaf)

Click site name for graph.
Forecast
Period
90%
Exceedance
Volume
50%
Exceedance
Volume
Percent
Average
10%
Exceedance
Volume
Spanish Fork
Castilla, Nr April-July40456550
May-July30356540
Provo
Woodland, Nr April-July62727286
May-July55657379
Hailstone, Nr April-July63767692
May-July54677783
Deer Ck Res April-July688876105
May-July53697386
American Fork
American Fork, Nr, Up Pwrplnt, AbvApril-July19237426
May-July17217524
West Canyon Ck
Cedar Fort, Nr April-July0.410.92521.8
May-July0.40.9581.8
Salt Ck
Nephi April-July3.96.66910.5
May-July3.36799.9
Jordan
Utah Lake, Provo, Nr April-July17721568255
May-July11015063190

Differences between the full period forecasts and the residual forecasts may not exactly equal the actual observed volumes due to rounding conventions (see Definitions section).

Great Basin End of Month Reservoir Contents (kaf)

Usable
Capacity
EOM
Contents
Percent
Usable
Capacity
Last Year
EOM
Last Year
%Capacity
untitled Bear
Woodruff Narrows Res 55.8 57.3 103 57.3 103
untitled Bear River
Bear Lake, Nr Lifton 1302.0 476.7 37 337.4 26
untitled Little Bear
Hyrum Res Abv 15.3 14.9 98 15.6 102
untitled Willard Reservoir Storage
215.0 192.1 89 177.7 83
untitled Sf Ogden
Causey Res 7.1 6.5 92 4.8 68
untitled Ogden
Pineview Res, Ogden, Nr 110.1 92.0 84 93.3 85
untitled Lost Ck
Lost Ck Res, Croydon, Nr 22.5 18.3 81 19.6 87
untitled Weber
Rockport Res, Wanship, Nr 60.9 58.3 96 53.9 88
Echo Res, Echo, At 73.9 72.3 98 67.6 91
untitled East Canyon Ck
East Canyon Res, Morgan, Nr 49.5 46.4 94 45.6 92
untitled Dell Fk
Little Dell Res 20.5 15.4 75 15.2 74
untitled Mountain Dell Dam
3.0 1.8 61 1.6 55
untitled Jordanelle Dam
311.0 233.4 75 242.9 78
untitled Provo
Deer Ck Res 149.7 150.0 100 149.5 100
untitled Jordan
Utah Lake, Provo, Nr 870.9 870.0 100 872.8 100
untitled
TOTAL 3267.2 2305.4 71 2154.8 66

Precipitation Maps




Definitions

10% exceedance forecast: Given the current hydrometeorological conditions, i.e current snowpack, soil moisture and streamflow, the volume that has a 10% chance of being exceeded. Previously referred to as "Reasonable Maximum Forecast".

50% exceedance forecast: Given the current hydrometeorological conditions, i.e current snowpack, soil moisture and streamflow, the volume that has a 50% chance of being exceeded. Previously referred to as "Most Probable Forecast".

90% exceedance forecast: Given the current hydrometeorological conditions, i.e current snowpack, soil moisture and streamflow, the volume that has a 90% chance of being exceeded. Previously referred to as "Reasonable Minimum Forecast".

Acre-Foot (af): The volume equal to one acre covered one foot deep (43,560 cubic feet). See kaf below.

Average: The arithmetic mean. The sum of the values divided by the number of values. Values from 1971-2000 are used for this publication.

Categories: Much Above Average=Greater than 130%, Above Average=111-130%, Near Average=90-110%, Below Average=70-89%, Much Below Average=Less than 70%.

CBRFC: Colorado Basin River Forecast Center.

Forecast Period: The period from April 1 through July 31, unless otherwise noted.

kaf: Thousand Acre-Feet. See Acre-Foot above.

Inflow: The volume of water that flows into a reservoir or lake.

Median: The middle value of an ordered set of values. Half of the values are higher and half of the values are lower. When the set contains an even number of values the median is the average of the two middle numbers.

NOAA: National Oceanic and Atomospheric Administration.

NWS: National Weather Service.

Rounding Conventions:
RangeRound to
0-1.990.01
2.0-19.90.1
20-1991.0
200-9995.0
1000+3 significant digits


Streamflow: The volume of water that flows past a specific stream site.

Water Year: The 12-month period, October 1 through September 30. The water year is designated by the calendar year in which it ends. Thus, the year ending September 30, 2008, is called the "2008 water year."


Additional Information

Water supply forecasts take into consideration present hydrometeorological conditions and use average basin temperatures and precipitation for the forecast period. As the forecast season progresses, a greater portion of the future hydrologic and climatic uncertainty becomes known and monthly forecasts become more accurate. For more information on the tools we use, consult Water Supply Forecasting Tools.

Volume forecasts represent adjusted flows; that is, observed flows with upstream water use taken into account. Adjusted flows will closely approximate natural or unimpaired flows. However, not all upstream diversions or impoundments are measured or quantifiable. For specific adjustments used with each forecast point, consult the Guide to Water Supply Forecasting.

The Water Supply Outlook is issued monthly January through May by the Colorado Basin River Forecast Center. It represents a coordinated effort between the National Weather Service, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Geological Survey and local water district managers.

Note: Data used in this report are provisional and are subject to revision.

For more information, or to be included on the mailing list, please contact:

Colorado Basin River Forecast Center
2242 W North Temple
Salt Lake City, UT 84116
(801) 524-5130
www.cbrfc.noaa.gov


Hydrologist: B.Bernard