Note: This publication is currently undergoing major revisions. The current publication will be replaced with a new publication based on stakeholder requirements and scientific advances. We expect to begin sharing details on this soon. If you have input on content, format, or publication frequency at any time, please contact us at cbrfc.webmasters@noaa.gov.Great Basin Water Supply Outlook, June 1, 2009

Great Basin Water Supply Outlook, June 1, 2009


Prepared by B.Bernard
NOAA, National Weather Service
Colorado Basin River Forecast Center
Salt Lake City, Utah
www.cbrfc.noaa.gov

Contents

Great Basin Summary

-Snow Water Equivalent & Precipitation... The Great Basin received below average precipitation during May 2009. Monthly totals were 70% of average. May departures from minimum temperature were 1-5 degrees above normal but the real story occurred during the second week of May when Northern Utah maximum temperatures were 10-18 degrees above normal. This week of very high temperatures peaked flows on rivers across the basin. Indexed snow totals were were less than 10% of average at all locations. As of early June the snow pack is nearly gone with the only remnants remaining on northerly facing slopes above 10,000 ft. Snow graphs indicate that in some places the melt occurred 20-30 days earlier than normal.

-Soil Moisture & Streamflow... Stream flow on the Weber, Provo and Bear rivers were 141%, 161% and 118% of average. These high flows were in the top 10 record May flow number rankings according to the USGS. Despite the high inflow volumes, outflow from the numerous reservoirs across the GSL basin were managed well and most reservoirs are now full ensuring water supplies are at their maximum for summer 2009. A forseable consequence of the early melt is that stream flow will now rapidly decline for the remainder of the April through July period. Streamflow models currently indicate that flows will likely be 40-60% of their normal monthly average for June and July.

-Short Term Precipitation Forecasts... Weather guidance from National Weather Service Meteorological Models show above average precipitation and below average temperature conditions during the first 6-10 days of June. Meteorological models on June 8, indicate the Great Basin will remain under a moist southwest flow regime through June 17, 2009. Short term Climate Prediction Center guidance shows a slight shift to above average temperatures and below average precipitaiton conditions for the second half of June, 2009.

-General Discussion... Longer range predictions from NOAA's Climate Prediction Center are now suggesting a transition from ENSO-neutral conditions to El Nino conditions during June-August 2009. Please reference this CPC web link for further details and effects in the intermountain region.

-Volumetric forecasts... June through July forecast for the Great Basin areas basins are average to much below average reflecting the dry and warm conditions encountered during May, the early melt of snowpacks and last years dry soil moisture states that are decreasing in channel stream flows. April through July volume were dervived by summing observed April and May flows (where available) to the June through July volumetric forecasts. A-J values will be update as we review and revise observed streamflow values throughout summer and fall.

-Great Basin Elevation... Current ESP estimates for the 2009 GSL maximum summer elevation are 4194.68 ft, a decrease of 2 tenths. We expect the Salt Lake Marina's maximum elevation to reach 1 to 1.5 feet higher than the Saline value in late June. The Saline gage as of June 4th was reading 4194.60 ft. and the harbor gage was reading 4195.71 ft. The minimum elevation at Saline between May 1 and October 1 is forecast to be 4192.3 ft. Winds can and do affect daily readings depending on the direction, strength and duration of winds across the lake. This summer maximum elevation should occur this month unless we encounter a near record heavy or widespread precipitation event which is very unlikely.



*Median of forecasts within each basin.


Bear Basin Conditions

-Snow Water Equivalent & Precipitation... Monthly precipitation was was below normal during May at 74% of average. Snow water equivalent index values are 4% of average as of June 8th. This represents the melting of snow nearly 20 days earlier than normal. Seasonal precipitation decreased to 103% of average due to our dry May conditions.

-Streamflow... Observed streamflows for Bear at the UT/WY State line were 158% of average. Inflows to Woodruff Narrows Reservoir however (unregulated) were 118% of average showing a loss for the reach. Observed flows on the Logan River nr Logan above State Dam were also lower than expected at 113% of average respectively. We currently surmise that dry soils, unaccounted for diversions and usage of the Bear coupled with warm temperatures, decreased the flows in this location, however we are not sure of the exact cause of the loss. These lower than expected flows will likely decrease the total April through July volumes when year end verification occurs. Currently June and July volumes are expected to be below normal since the the high elevation snow that normally drives June and July flows is gone.

-Short Term Precipitation Forecasts... Weather guidance from National Weather Service Meteorological Models show above average precipitation and below average temperature conditions during the first 6-10 days of June. Meteorological models on June 8, indicate the Great Basin will remain under a moist southwest flow regime through June 17, 2009. Short term Climate Prediction Center guidance shows a slight shift to above average temperatures and below average precipitaiton conditions for the second half of June, 2009.

-General Discussion... Longer range predictions from NOAA's Climate Prediction Center are now suggesting a transition from ENSO-neutral conditions to El Nino conditions during June-August 2009. Please reference this CPC web link for further details and effects in the intermountain region.

June through July forecast ranged from 59% of average for Hyrum Reservoir to 90% on the Smith Fork River Nr WY/ID Border. The median June through July forecast is 62% of average. The median April through July forecast was 89% of average.

Please note that forecast at Woodruff Narrows Reservoir and Stewart Dam are REGULATED inflows, meaning they reflect only observed streamflows and are not corrected for diversions and storage upstream. Given the nature of these forecast points you cannot corrolate them with upstream forecasts.



* Percent usable capacity, not percent average contents.
Click for multi-month Graph.

Weber Basin Conditions

-Snow Water Equivalent and Precipitation... Dry condtions prevailed during May across the Weber basin. Monthly precipitation for the Weber and Ogden basins totalled 59% of average and decreasing seasonal numbers to 101% of average. Snow water equivalent index values are 4% of average (June 8), melting nearly 20 days earlier than normal.

-Streamflow... Streamflows were 141% of average for the Weber at Oakley, 94% for the Weber at Rockport, 110% for the Weber at Echo Reservoir. Despite the high inflow volumes last month, outflow from the numberous reservoirs in the Weber basin were managed well and all reservoirs in this basin are now full ensuring water supplies are at their maximum for summer 2009

-Short Term Precipitation Forecasts... Weather guidance from National Weather Service Meteorological Models show above average precipitation and below average temperature conditions during the first 6-10 days of June. Meteorological models on June 8, indicate the Great Basin will remain under a moist southwest flow regime through June 17, 2009. Short term Climate Prediction Center guidance shows a slight shift to above average temperatures and below average precipitaiton conditions for the second half of June, 2009.

-General Discussion... Longer range predictions from NOAA's Climate Prediction Center are now suggesting a transition from ENSO-neutral conditions to El Nino conditions during June-August 2009. Please reference this CPC web link for further details and effects in the intermountain region.

June through July residual forecasts ranged from 60% to 79% of average. The median June through July forecast was 70% of average. The April through July Forecast for Weber at Oakley is now 100% of average.



* Percent usable capacity, not percent average contents.
Click for multi-month Graph.

Six Creeks Basin Conditions

-Snow Water Equivalent & Precipitation... The Six Creeks drainages received 75% of average monthly precipitation during May. June 1st SWE was 38% of average Snow water equivalent index values are currently 26% of average (June 8), and is melting away nearly 20 days earlier than normal. Only sites above 10,000 feet on north facing slopes are showing any SWE at this time. Seasonal precipitation dropped from 120% to 112% of average. Warmer than average temperatures for May and below average precipitation are the cause of the current snow states.

-Streamflow... Steam flows for both Big and Little Cottonwood canyons were above average during May. Big Cottonwoods monthly flow was 152% of average and Little Cottonwood ended the month at 137% of average. Peak flows occurred during the third week of May. We currently expect flows for June and July to be near average based on modelled output.

-Short Term Precipitation Forecasts... Weather guidance from National Weather Service Meteorological Models show above average precipitation and below average temperature conditions during the first 6-10 days of June. Meteorological models on June 8, indicate the Great Basin will remain under a moist southwest flow regime through June 17, 2009. Short term Climate Prediction Center guidance shows a slight shift to above average temperatures and below average precipitaiton conditions for the second half of June, 2009.

-General Discussion... Longer range predictions from NOAA's Climate Prediction Center are now suggesting a transition from ENSO-neutral conditions to El Nino conditions during June-August 2009. Please reference this CPC web link for further details and effects in the intermountain region.

June through July volume forecasts ranged from 77% to 90% of average with a median of 79% of average. Observations and or estimates from April and May were added to the June through July forecast to then calculate the April through July volumes. Dry weather and declining snow packs caused a decrease in the forecasted April through July volumes in some locations. The average of all April through July volume forecasts was 95% of average.



* Percent usable capacity, not percent average contents.
Click for multi-month Graph.

Utah Lake Basin Conditions

-Snow Water Equivalent & Precipitation... Utah Lake monthly precipitation was below normal at 87% of average. On June 1st the indexed snow was 38% of average. Snow water equivalent index values now are 13% of average (June 8), melting nearly 20 days earlier than normal. This rapid melt is in response to unseasonably warm temperatures for 3 weeks in May. Seasonal precipitation now totals 106% of average.

-Streamflow... Stream flow in the upper reaches of the Provo River were much above normal for May at 161% of average at the Woodland gage. This value ranked Provo - Woodland as the 4th highest month flow ever recorded since records have been kept. June and July forecast indicated flows will decrease to below average but given the very high April and May volumes for the period, April through July should be at or above average for the period.

-Short Term Precipitation Forecasts... Weather guidance from National Weather Service Meteorological Models show above average precipitation and below average temperature conditions during the first 6-10 days of June. Meteorological models on June 8, indicate the Great Basin will remain under a moist southwest flow regime through June 17, 2009. Short term Climate Prediction Center guidance shows a slight shift to above average temperatures and below average precipitaiton conditions for the second half of June, 2009.

-General Discussion... Longer range predictions from NOAA's Climate Prediction Center are now suggesting a transition from ENSO-neutral conditions to El Nino conditions during June-August 2009. Please reference this CPC web link for further details and effects in the intermountain region.

June through July forecasts ranged from 67% to 92% with a median of 68% of average. The April through July forecasts were calculated by adding April, May observed and or estimated flows to June, July forecasts. The April through July median forecast for the Utah Lake Basin was 98% of average.



* Percent usable capacity, not percent average contents.
Click for multi-month Graph.


Bear Specific Site Forecasts (kaf)

Click site name for graph.
Forecast
Period
90%
Exceedance
Volume
50%
Exceedance
Volume
Percent
Average
10%
Exceedance
Volume
Bear
UtahApril-July115120106127
June-July54578164
Woodruff Narrows Res April-July11011786122
June-July37403746
Montpelier, Nr, Stewart Dam, Blo April-July10513959150
June-July66686278
Big Ck
Randolph, Nr April-July1.62.4493.7
June-July0.41.2552.5
Smiths Fork
Border, Nr April-July909592100
June-July53559060
Logan
Logan, Nr, State Dam, Abv April-July10011087113
June-July48527455
Blacksmith Fork
Hyrum, Nr, Upnl Dam, Abv April-July40449248
June-July15.5168017
Little Bear
Paradise April-July374910760
June-July7.58599.2


Weber Specific Site Forecasts (kaf)

Click site name for graph.
Forecast
Period
90%
Exceedance
Volume
50%
Exceedance
Volume
Percent
Average
10%
Exceedance
Volume
Weber
Oakley, Nr April-July115123100130
June-July50537560
Rockport Res, Wanship, Nr April-July10511082118
June-July47517159
Coalville, Nr April-July10010878116
June-July44476755
Chalk Ck
Coalville April-July38419144
June-July11.2127015
Weber
Echo Res, Echo, At April-July15015888170
June-July45506056
Lost Ck
Lost Ck Res, Croydon, Nr April-July611.16317.5
June-July2.83653.2
East Canyon Ck
East Canyon Res, Morgan, Nr April-July24278733
June-July6.57747.6
Weber
Gateway April-July19029583405
June-July859071103
Sf Ogden
Huntsville, Nr April-July44599274
June-July14.5159316.7
Ogden
Pineview Res, Ogden, Nr April-July9012090157
June-July24268731
Wheeler Ck
Huntsville, Nr April-July3.45797.8
June-July0.151.5713.3


Six Creeks Specific Site Forecasts (kaf)

Click site name for graph.
Forecast
Period
90%
Exceedance
Volume
50%
Exceedance
Volume
Percent
Average
10%
Exceedance
Volume
Little Cottonwood Ck
Salt Lake City, Nr April-July37399841
June-July19218123
Big Cottonwood Ck
Salt Lake City, Nr April-July404311347
June-July17188620
Mill Ck
Salt Lake City, Nr April-July56.1877
June-July2.52.8783.2
Dell Fk
Little Dell Res April-July55.3785.4
June-July1.21.3771.4
Parleys Ck
Salt Lake City, Nr April-July1314.38616
June-July4.34.5784.7
Emigration Ck
Salt Lake City, Nr April-July44.4985
June-July0.91811.1
City Ck
Salt Lake City, Nr April-July8.29.110510
June-July3.63.8904.1
Vernon Ck
Vernon, Nr April-June0.281681.9
June-July0.070.4700.73
S Willow Ck
Grantsville, Nr April-July23.21004.4
June-July11.6882.2


Utah Lake Specific Site Forecasts (kaf)

Click site name for graph.
Forecast
Period
90%
Exceedance
Volume
50%
Exceedance
Volume
Percent
Average
10%
Exceedance
Volume
Spanish Fork
Castilla, Nr April-July357192107
June-July22249225
Provo
Woodland, Nr April-July97115112133
June-July33356740
Hailstone, Nr April-July108134123160
June-July33366841
Deer Ck Res April-July122149118176
June-July36386844
American Fork
American Fork, Nr, Up Pwrplnt, AbvApril-July21268131
June-July13157516.3
Jordan
Utah Lake, Provo, Nr April-July0000
June-July728368100

Differences between the full period forecasts and the residual forecasts may not exactly equal the actual observed volumes due to rounding conventions (see Definitions section).

Great Basin Reservoir Contents (kaf)

Usable
Capacity
EOM
Contents
Percent
Usable
Capacity
Last Year
EOM
Last Year
%Capacity
untitled Bear
Woodruff Narrows Res 55.8 57.3 103 56.0 100
untitled Bear River
Bear Lake, Nr Lifton 1302.0 400.9 31 355.3 27
untitled Little Bear
Hyrum Res Abv 15.3 15.4 101 15.4 101
untitled Willard Reservoir Storage
215.0 200.2 93 80.1 37
untitled Sf Ogden
Causey Res 7.1 7.2 101 7.2 101
untitled Ogden
Pineview Res, Ogden, Nr 110.1 110.7 101 112.0 102
untitled Lost Ck
Lost Ck Res, Croydon, Nr 22.5 22.6 101 22.6 100
untitled Weber
Rockport Res, Wanship, Nr 60.9 60.4 99 55.0 90
Echo Res, Echo, At 73.9 74.6 101 73.9 100
untitled East Canyon Ck
East Canyon Res, Morgan, Nr 49.5 49.8 101 49.5 100
untitled Dell Fk
Little Dell Res 20.5 17.5 85 0.0 0
untitled Mountain Dell Dam
3.0 1.7 56 0.0 0
untitled Jordanelle Dam
311.0 310.1 100 273.5 88
untitled Provo
Deer Ck Res 149.7 147.1 98 76.0 51
untitled Jordan
Utah Lake, Provo, Nr 870.9 918.0 105 850.8 98
untitled
TOTAL 3267.2 2393.5 73 2027.3 62

Precipitation Maps




Definitions

10% exceedance forecast: Given the current hydrometeorological conditions, i.e current snowpack, soil moisture and streamflow, the volume that has a 10% chance of being exceeded. Previously referred to as "Reasonable Maximum Forecast".

50% exceedance forecast: Given the current hydrometeorological conditions, i.e current snowpack, soil moisture and streamflow, the volume that has a 50% chance of being exceeded. Previously referred to as "Most Probable Forecast".

90% exceedance forecast: Given the current hydrometeorological conditions, i.e current snowpack, soil moisture and streamflow, the volume that has a 90% chance of being exceeded. Previously referred to as "Reasonable Minimum Forecast".

Acre-Foot (af): The volume equal to one acre covered one foot deep (43,560 cubic feet). See kaf below.

Average: The arithmetic mean. The sum of the values divided by the number of values. Values from 1971-2000 are used for this publication.

Categories: Much Above Average=Greater than 130%, Above Average=111-130%, Near Average=90-110%, Below Average=70-89%, Much Below Average=Less than 70%.

CBRFC: Colorado Basin River Forecast Center.

Forecast Period: The period from April 1 through July 31, unless otherwise noted.

kaf: Thousand Acre-Feet. See Acre-Foot above.

Inflow: The volume of water that flows into a reservoir or lake.

Median: The middle value of an ordered set of values. Half of the values are higher and half of the values are lower. When the set contains an even number of values the median is the average of the two middle numbers.

NOAA: National Oceanic and Atomospheric Administration.

NWS: National Weather Service.

Rounding Conventions:
RangeRound to
0-1.990.01
2.0-19.90.1
20-1991.0
200-9995.0
1000+3 significant digits


Streamflow: The volume of water that flows past a specific stream site.

Water Year: The 12-month period, October 1 through September 30. The water year is designated by the calendar year in which it ends. Thus, the year ending September 30, 2008, is called the "2008 water year."


Additional Information

Water supply forecasts take into consideration present hydrometeorological conditions and use average basin temperatures and precipitation for the forecast period. As the forecast season progresses, a greater portion of the future hydrologic and climatic uncertainty becomes known and monthly forecasts become more accurate. For more information on the tools we use, consult Water Supply Forecasting Tools.

Volume forecasts represent adjusted flows; that is, observed flows with upstream water use taken into account. Adjusted flows will closely approximate natural or unimpaired flows. However, not all upstream diversions or impoundments are measured or quantifiable. For specific adjustments used with each forecast point, consult the Guide to Water Supply Forecasting.

The Water Supply Outlook is issued monthly January through May by the Colorado Basin River Forecast Center. It represents a coordinated effort between the National Weather Service, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Geological Survey and local water district managers.

Note: Data used in this report are provisional and are subject to revision.

For more information, or to be included on the mailing list, please contact:

Colorado Basin River Forecast Center
2242 W North Temple
Salt Lake City, UT 84116
(801) 524-5130
www.cbrfc.noaa.gov


Hydrologist: B.Bernard