Note: This publication is currently undergoing major revisions. The current publication will be replaced with a new publication based on stakeholder requirements and scientific advances. We expect to begin sharing details on this soon. If you have input on content, format, or publication frequency at any time, please contact us at cbrfc.webmasters@noaa.gov.Upper Colorado Water Supply Outlook, February 1, 2010
Upper Colorado Water Supply Outlook, February 1, 2010
The following conditions influenced this month's forecasts:
Precipitation:
Seasonal October through January precipitation
was near 80 percent of average in the Upper Colorado mainstem basin.
January precipitation was near 70 percent of average.
Snow:
February 1st snow water equivalent was near 75 percent of average in the basin
as a whole.
--- Upper Colorado basin snow
water equivalent plot
Streamflow:
January streamflow was near 80 percent of average.
Soil Moisture:
Modeled soil
moisture states were near average heading into the winter.
Climate Forecasts:
Climate forecasts were not a factor because there is not a strong correlation
between El Nino conditions and winter precipitation in the Upper Colorado mainstem basin.
Forecast Summary:
Due to the below average January precipitation and the decrease in the percent
of average snow water equivalent from January 1, the April through July
streamflow volume forecasts decreased from last month.
These forecasts now range between 59 and 100 percent of average, with a median
value of 75 percent.
The following conditions influenced this month's forecasts:
Precipitation:
Seasonal October through January precipitation was 90 percent of average
in the Gunnison basin. January precipitation was 90 percent of average.
Snow:
February 1st snow water equivalent was 95 percent of average in the Gunnison basin.
--- Gunnison basin snow
water equivalent plot
Streamflow:
January streamflow was 85 percent of average.
Soil Moisture:
Modeled soil
moisture states were below average heading into the winter.
Climate Forecasts:
Climate forecasts were not a factor because there is not a strong correlation
between El Nino conditions and winter precipitation in the Gunnison basin.
Forecast Summary:
Due to the average January precipitation in the Uncompahgre basin, the April through July volume
Forecast was raised slightly. This also raised the median forecast for the entire Gunnison basin
slightly, but it still remained below average. The Gunnison forecasts now range between 74 and 90 percent
of average, with a median value of 85 percent.
The following conditions influenced this month's forecasts:
Precipitation:
Seasonal October through January precipitation was 95 percent of average
in the Dolores basin. January precipitation was 115 percent of average.
Snow:
February 1st snow water equivalent was 105 percent of average in the Dolores basin.
--- Dolores basin snow
water equivalent plot
Streamflow:
January streamflow was 70 percent of average.
Soil Moisture:
Modeled soil
moisture states were below to much below average heading into the winter.
Climate Forecasts:
The correlation of El Nino and April through July water volumes in the Dolores basin is so small that
it did not influence the February forecast process.
Forecast Summary:
Due to the increase of the seasonal precipitation, the April through July streamflow
volume forecasts were raised to near average. These forecasts now range
between 88 and 95 percent of average, with a median value of 90 percent.
Differences between the full period forecasts and the residual forecasts may not exactly equal the actual observed volumes due to rounding conventions (see Definitions section).
Reservoir Monthly Inflow Forecasts
Upper Colorado End of Month Reservoir Contents (kaf)