Note: This publication is currently undergoing major revisions. The current publication will be replaced with a new publication based on stakeholder requirements and scientific advances. We expect to begin sharing details on this soon. If you have input on content, format, or publication frequency at any time, please contact us at cbrfc.webmasters@noaa.gov.Upper Colorado Water Supply Outlook, February 1, 2011

Upper Colorado Water Supply Outlook, February 1, 2011


Prepared by Brenda Alcorn, Tracy Cox
NOAA, National Weather Service
Colorado Basin River Forecast Center
Salt Lake City, Utah
www.cbrfc.noaa.gov

Contents

Upper Colorado Summary




*Median of forecasts within each basin.


Upper Colorado Mainstem Basin Conditions

The following conditions influenced this month's forecasts:

Precipitation:
Seasonal October through January precipitation was near 135 percent of average in the Upper Colorado mainstem basin. January precipitation was near 85 percent of average in the basin as a whole, however upper portions of the basin, such as the Blue and Eagle river basins and the mainstem headwaters, received near to above average precipitation.

Snow:
February 1st snow water equivalent was near 130 percent of average in the basin as a whole; this is 75% of the seasonal peak.
--- Upper Colorado basin snow water equivalent plot

Streamflow:
February streamflow was near 95 percent of average.

Soil Moisture:
Modeled soil moisture states were near to above average heading into the winter.

Climate Forecasts:
Climate forecasts were not a factor because there is not a strong correlation between La Nina conditions and winter precipitation in the Upper Colorado mainstem basin.

Forecast Summary:
January was the first month of this water year with below average precipitation in the Upper Colorado mainstem basin; monthly precipitation had been above to much above average each month of the water year prior to January. As of February 1st the percent of average of both the seasonal precipitation and snow water equivalent are lower than they were at the start of last month, but still much above average in the basin as a whole. Most forecast volumes are the same as last month. Decreases at the Colorado River near Cisco and Lake Powell inflow were due to changes in other contributing basins. Current April through July streamflow volume forecasts range between 113 and 139 percent of average with a median value of 120 percent.



* Percent usable capacity, not percent average contents.
Click for multi-month Graph.

Gunnison Basin Conditions

The following conditions influenced this month's forecasts:

Precipitation:
Seasonal October through January precipitation was 125 percent of average in the Gunnison basin. January precipitation was 55 percent of average.

Snow:
February 1st snow water equivalent was near 130 percent of average in the Gunnison basin; this is 75% of the seasonal peak.
--- Gunnison basin snow water equivalent plot

Streamflow:
January streamflow was 95 percent of average.

Soil Moisture:
Modeled soil moisture states were below to near average heading into the winter.

Climate Forecasts:
Climate forecasts were not a factor because there is not a strong correlation between La Nina conditions and winter precipitation in the Gunnison basin.

Forecast Summary:
January precipitation throughout the Gunnison basin was much below average at 55%. Seasonal precipitation for the Gunnison basin dropped from last month to 125% of average. February 1st seasonal snow water equivalent for the Gunnison was above average with 130%; whereas the snow water equivalent is 75% of the average seasonal peak. Since the percent of average for both seasonal snow water equivalent and seasonal precipitation decreased from last month, the current April through July streamflow volume forecasts dropped in the Gunnison Basin from last month's forecast. Current April through July streamflow volume forecasts range between 93 and 126 percent of average with a median value of 110 percent.



* Percent usable capacity, not percent average contents.
Click for multi-month Graph.

Dolores Basin Conditions

The following conditions influenced this month's forecasts:

Precipitation:
Seasonal October through January precipitation was 110 percent of average in the entire Dolores basin. January precipitation was just 25 percent of average.

Snow:
February 1st snow water equivalent was 100 percent of average in the Dolores basin as a whole; this is 60% of the seasonal peak.
--- Dolores basin snow water equivalent plot

Streamflow:
January streamflow was 95 percent of average.

Soil Moisture:
Modeled soil moisture states were average to slightly below average heading into the winter.

Climate Forecasts:
The correlation of La Nina and April through July water volumes in the Dolores basin is small that it did not influence the forecast process.

Forecast Summary:
January precipitation throughout the Dolores basin was much below average at 25%. Seasonal precipitation for the Dolores basin dropped from last month to 110% of average. February 1st seasonal snow water equivalent for the Dolores was average with 110%; whereas the snow water equivalent is 60% of the average seasonal peak. Since the percent of average for both seasonal snow water equivalent and seasonal precipitation decreased from last month, the current April through July streamflow volume forecasts dropped in the Dolores Basin from last month's forecast. Current April through July streamflow volume forecasts range between 87 and 93 percent of average, with a median value of 90 percent.



* Percent usable capacity, not percent average contents.
Click for multi-month Graph.


Upper Colorado Mainstem Specific Site Forecasts (kaf)

Click site name for graph.
Forecast
Period
90%
Exceedance
Volume
50%
Exceedance
Volume
Percent
Average
10%
Exceedance
Volume
Colorado
Lake Granby, Granby, Nr April-July205280124370
Willow Ck
Willow Ck Res, Granby, Nr April-July426512792
Fraser
Winter Park April-July17.32311529
Williams Fork
Williams Fork Res, Parshall, Nr April-July77110116149
Muddy Ck
Wolford Mtn Res, Blo April-July4976127109
Blue
Dillon Res April-July142205123280
Green Mtn Res April-July235340121465
Colorado
Kremmling, Nr April-July80010801241450
Eagle
Gypsum, Blo April-July255380113530
Colorado
Dotsero, Nr April-July125017301202350
Frying Pan
Ruedi Res, Basalt, Nr April-July112160113215
Roaring Fork
Glenwood Springs April-July5958301171100
Colorado
Glenwood Springs, Blo April-July190025601193500
Cameo, Nr April-July207029101203950
Plateau Ck
Cameo, Nr April-July100160139230
Colorado
Cisco, Nr April-July355053701157500
Mill Ck
Moab, Nr, Sheley Tun, At April-July2.951008
Colorado
Lake Powell, Glen Cyn Dam, At April-July5700900011312800


Gunnison Specific Site Forecasts (kaf)

Click site name for graph.
Forecast
Period
90%
Exceedance
Volume
50%
Exceedance
Volume
Percent
Average
10%
Exceedance
Volume
Taylor
Taylor Park Res April-July79115112158
Almont April-July150190115260
East
Almont April-July159220115290
Gunnison
Gunnison, Nr April-July310445114600
Tomichi Ck
Gunnison April-July357593138
Lake Fork
Gateview April-July8812498166
Gunnison
Blue Mesa Res April-July5407751081100
Morrow Point Res April-July6008451081170
Crystal Res April-July6609501041290
Muddy Ck
Paonia Res, Bardine, Nr March-June77126126187
April-July75129126197
Nf Gunnison
Somerset, Nr April-July255370121505
Surface Ck
Cedaredge April-July14.22112330
Uncompahgre
Ridgway Res April-July6610098142
Colona April-July7213094205
Delta April-July65120103185
Gunnison
Grand Junction, Nr April-July109017001092450


Dolores Specific Site Forecasts (kaf)

Click site name for graph.
Forecast
Period
90%
Exceedance
Volume
50%
Exceedance
Volume
Percent
Average
10%
Exceedance
Volume
Dolores
Dolores April-July13823087355
Mcphee Res April-July17329091435
San Miguel
Placerville, Nr April-July7912091173
Dolores
Cisco, Nr April-July33057593890

Differences between the full period forecasts and the residual forecasts may not exactly equal the actual observed volumes due to rounding conventions (see Definitions section).

Reservoir Monthly Inflow Forecasts






Upper Colorado End of Month Reservoir Contents (kaf)

Usable
Capacity
EOM
Contents
Percent
Usable
Capacity
Last Year
EOM
Last Year
%Capacity
untitled Colorado
Lake Granby, Granby, Nr 490.3 401.4 82 353.0 72
untitled Willow Ck
Willow Ck Res, Granby, Nr 9.1 9.0 98 6.7 74
untitled Williams Fork
Williams Fork Res, Parshall, Nr 96.9 80.7 83 76.5 79
untitled Muddy Ck
Wolford Mountain Reservoir 66.0 53.1 80 51.8 78
untitled Blue
Dillon Res 254.0 220.9 87 240.2 95
Green Mtn Res 146.9 77.0 52 79.4 54
untitled Homestake Ck
Homestake Res 43.0 37.4 87 21.8 51
untitled Frying Pan
Ruedi Res, Basalt, Nr 102.0 72.0 71 70.6 69
untitled Plateau Ck
Vega Res, Collbran, Nr 32.9 12.6 38 12.0 36
untitled Taylor
Taylor Park Res 106.2 74.3 70 66.6 63
untitled Gunnison
Blue Mesa Res 829.5 554.0 67 559.9 67
Morrow Point Res 117.0 112.0 96 109.5 94
Crystal Res 17.5 15.8 90 14.8 84
untitled Muddy Ck
Paonia Res, Bardine, Nr 18.5 0.7 4 1.4 8
untitled Uncompahgre
Ridgway Res 83.2 67.4 81 65.3 79
untitled Dolores
Mcphee Res 381.1 273.1 72 253.8 67
untitled
TOTAL 2794.1 2061.3 74 1983.3 71
Colorado
Lake Powell 24322.0 13828.0 57 13991.3 58
untitled
TOTAL 24322.0 13828.0 57 13991.3 58

Monthly Streamflows









Precipitation Maps




Definitions

10% exceedance forecast: Given the current hydrometeorological conditions, i.e current snowpack, soil moisture and streamflow, the volume that has a 10% chance of being exceeded. Previously referred to as "Reasonable Maximum Forecast".

50% exceedance forecast: Given the current hydrometeorological conditions, i.e current snowpack, soil moisture and streamflow, the volume that has a 50% chance of being exceeded. Previously referred to as "Most Probable Forecast".

90% exceedance forecast: Given the current hydrometeorological conditions, i.e current snowpack, soil moisture and streamflow, the volume that has a 90% chance of being exceeded. Previously referred to as "Reasonable Minimum Forecast".

Acre-Foot (af): The volume equal to one acre covered one foot deep (43,560 cubic feet). See kaf below.

Average: The arithmetic mean. The sum of the values divided by the number of values. Values from 1981-2010 are used for this publication.

Categories: Much Above Average=Greater than 130%, Above Average=111-130%, Near Average=90-110%, Below Average=70-89%, Much Below Average=Less than 70%.

CBRFC: Colorado Basin River Forecast Center.

Forecast Period: The period from April 1 through July 31, unless otherwise noted.

kaf: Thousand Acre-Feet. See Acre-Foot above.

Inflow: The volume of water that flows into a reservoir or lake.

Median: The middle value of an ordered set of values. Half of the values are higher and half of the values are lower. When the set contains an even number of values the median is the average of the two middle numbers.

NOAA: National Oceanic and Atomospheric Administration.

NWS: National Weather Service.

Rounding Conventions:
RangeRound to
0-1.990.01
2.0-19.90.1
20-1991.0
200-9995.0
1000+3 significant digits


Streamflow: The volume of water that flows past a specific stream site.

Water Year: The 12-month period, October 1 through September 30. The water year is designated by the calendar year in which it ends. Thus, the year ending September 30, 2008, is called the "2008 water year."


Additional Information

Water supply forecasts take into consideration present hydrometeorological conditions and use average basin temperatures and precipitation for the forecast period. As the forecast season progresses, a greater portion of the future hydrologic and climatic uncertainty becomes known and monthly forecasts become more accurate. For more information on the tools we use, consult Water Supply Forecasting Tools.

Volume forecasts represent adjusted flows; that is, observed flows with upstream water use taken into account. Adjusted flows will closely approximate natural or unimpaired flows. However, not all upstream diversions or impoundments are measured or quantifiable. For specific adjustments used with each forecast point, consult the Guide to Water Supply Forecasting.

The Water Supply Outlook is issued monthly January through May by the Colorado Basin River Forecast Center. It represents a coordinated effort between the National Weather Service, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Geological Survey and local water district managers.

Note: Data used in this report are provisional and are subject to revision.

For more information, or to be included on the mailing list, please contact:

Colorado Basin River Forecast Center
2242 W North Temple
Salt Lake City, UT 84116
(801) 524-5130
www.cbrfc.noaa.gov


Hydrologist: Brenda Alcorn, Tracy Cox