Lower Colorado Water Supply Outlook, February 1, 2008

Note: This publication is scheduled for revision. If you have feedback on content, format, or publication frequency, please contact us.
Prepared by G. Smith
NOAA, National Weather Service
Colorado Basin River Forecast Center
Salt Lake City, Utah
www.cbrfc.noaa.gov

Contents

Lower Colorado Summary

Significant precipitation occurred in early and late January resulting in very high runoff volumes. January volumes reached near 1500 percent of the monthly median in the Salt River Basin. In the Gila Basin volumes exceeded 400 percent of median with highest volumes on the San Francisco tributary. In the Little Colorado flows were measured in excess of 500 percent of median. Runoff volumes for the February through May period are expected to range from 100 to 300 percent of median. Higher volumes are possible if additional heavy precipitation events occur.



*Median of forecasts within each basin.


Salt Basin Conditions

January through May runoff volumes in the Salt River Basin are expected to range from near 150 to 250 percent of the median. The snowpack in the upper Salt Basin ranges from 130 to 200 percent of average and has already exceeded the annual seasonal peak that usually occurs in early March. Due to saturated conditions, additional precipitation during the February through May period may contribute significantly to runoff volumes.



* Percent usable capacity, not percent average contents.
Click for multi-month Graph.

Gila Basin Conditions

January through May runoff volumes in the Gila River Basin are expected to range from near 100 to 120 percent of median in the Gila headwaters and 150 to 180 percent of median in the San Francsico drainage. The snowpack in the San Francisco Basin ranges from 110 to 200 percent of average and has exceeded the average seasonal peak. Due to saturated conditions, additional precipitation during the February through May period may result in significant contribution to runoff volumes.



* Percent usable capacity, not percent average contents.
Click for multi-month Graph.

Little Colorado Basin Conditions

January through May runoff volumes in the Little Colorado Basin are expected to range from near 130 to 320 percent of median. Above average precipitation was received in December and January. Snowpack in the Little Colorado southern headwaters is near 200 percent of average and has exceeded the average seasonal peak. Due to saturated conditions, additional precipitation during the Februar through May period may result in significant contribution to runoff volumes.



* Percent usable capacity, not percent average contents.
Click for multi-month Graph.


Salt Specific Site Forecasts (kaf)

Click site name for graph.
Forecast
Period
90%
Exceedance
Volume
50%
Exceedance
Volume
Percent
Average
10%
Exceedance
Volume
Salt
Roosevelt, Nr February-May3256101721030
Tonto Ck
Roosevelt, Nr, Gun Ck, Abv February-May45130260285
Verde
Blo Tangle Ck, Abv Horsehoe Dam February-May193360180605


Gila Specific Site Forecasts (kaf)

Click site name for graph.
Forecast
Period
90%
Exceedance
Volume
50%
Exceedance
Volume
Percent
Average
10%
Exceedance
Volume
Gila
Gila, Nr February-May345710889
Virden, Nr, Blue Ck, Blo February-May19.87499128
Solomon, Nr, Head Of Safford Vly February-May33170118305
San Carlos Res, Coolidge Dam, At February-May32135161240
San Francisco
Glenwood, Nr February-May254016760
Clifton February-May4185144141
San Pedro
Charleston February-May23.11076.1


Little Colorado Specific Site Forecasts (kaf)

Click site name for graph.
Forecast
Period
90%
Exceedance
Volume
50%
Exceedance
Volume
Percent
Average
10%
Exceedance
Volume
Little Colorado
Lyman Lk, Abv, St. Johns, Nr February-June4.612.117025
Woodruff February-May4.8932113.2
Rio Nutria
Ramah, Nr February-May0.48413313.7
Zuni
Black Rock Res, Abv February-May1.22.31694
Cebolla Ck
Ramah Res February-May0.132.11276.5
East Clear Ck
Blue Ridge Res, Pine, Nr February-May8.62012339
Clear Ck
Winslow, Nr February-May2670206114
Chevelon Ck
Winslow, Nr, Wildcat Cyn, Blo February-May112014440
Walnut Ck
Lake Mary February-May4.1816713.7

Differences between the full period forecasts and the residual forecasts may not exactly equal the actual observed volumes due to rounding conventions (see Definitions section).

Lower Colorado Reservoir Contents (kaf)

Usable
Capacity
EOM
Contents
Percent
Usable
Capacity
Last Year
EOM
Last Year
%Capacity
Salt
Roosevelt 1653.0 1248.4 76 1032.0 62
Horse Mesa 245.0 231.3 94 179.0 73
Mormon Flat 58.0 56.1 97 57.0 98
Stewart Mountain 70.0 68.5 98 67.0 96
Horseshoe 109.2 104.2 95 0.0 0
Bartlett 178.0 176.9 99 73.0 41
untitled
TOTAL 2313.2 1885.4 82 1408.0 61
Little Colorado
Lyman Lake 31.0 9.0 29 7.5 24
Bill Williams
Alamo 1045.0 148.7 14 132.0 13
Agua Fria
Lake Pleasant 1145.0 680.8 59 731.0 64
Gila
San Carlos 885.0 248.7 28 272.0 31
Painted Rock 2476.0 0.0 0 0.0 0
Colorado
Lake Powell 24322.0 10880.4 45 11703.4 48
Lake Mead 27380.0 13005.0 47 14308.0 52
Lake Mohave 1810.0 1671.0 92 1632.0 90
Lake Havasu -1.0 556.0 -99 576.0 -99
untitled
TOTAL 59094.0 27199.5 46 29361.9 50

Precipitation Maps




Definitions

10% exceedance forecast: Given the current hydrometeorological conditions, i.e current snowpack, soil moisture and streamflow, the volume that has a 10% chance of being exceeded. Previously referred to as "Reasonable Maximum Forecast".

50% exceedance forecast: Given the current hydrometeorological conditions, i.e current snowpack, soil moisture and streamflow, the volume that has a 50% chance of being exceeded. Previously referred to as "Most Probable Forecast".

90% exceedance forecast: Given the current hydrometeorological conditions, i.e current snowpack, soil moisture and streamflow, the volume that has a 90% chance of being exceeded. Previously referred to as "Reasonable Minimum Forecast".

Acre-Foot (af): The volume equal to one acre covered one foot deep (43,560 cubic feet). See kaf below.

Average: The arithmetic mean. The sum of the values divided by the number of values. Values from 1971-2000 are used for this publication.

Categories: Much Above Average=Greater than 130%, Above Average=111-130%, Near Average=90-110%, Below Average=70-89%, Much Below Average=Less than 70%.

CBRFC: Colorado Basin River Forecast Center.

Forecast Period: The period from April 1 through July 31, unless otherwise noted.

kaf: Thousand Acre-Feet. See Acre-Foot above.

Inflow: The volume of water that flows into a reservoir or lake.

Median: The middle value of an ordered set of values. Half of the values are higher and half of the values are lower. When the set contains an even number of values the median is the average of the two middle numbers.

NOAA: National Oceanic and Atomospheric Administration.

NWS: National Weather Service.

Rounding Conventions:
RangeRound to
0-1.990.01
2.0-19.90.1
20-1991.0
200-9995.0
1000+3 significant digits


Streamflow: The volume of water that flows past a specific stream site.

Water Year: The 12-month period, October 1 through September 30. The water year is designated by the calendar year in which it ends. Thus, the year ending September 30, 2008, is called the "2008 water year."


Additional Information

Water supply forecasts take into consideration present hydrometeorological conditions and use average basin temperatures and precipitation for the forecast period. As the forecast season progresses, a greater portion of the future hydrologic and climatic uncertainty becomes known and monthly forecasts become more accurate. For more information on the tools we use, consult Water Supply Forecasting Tools.

Volume forecasts represent adjusted flows; that is, observed flows with upstream water use taken into account. Adjusted flows will closely approximate natural or unimpaired flows. However, not all upstream diversions or impoundments are measured or quantifiable. For specific adjustments used with each forecast point, consult the Guide to Water Supply Forecasting.

The Water Supply Outlook is issued monthly January through May by the Colorado Basin River Forecast Center. It represents a coordinated effort between the National Weather Service, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Geological Survey and local water district managers.

Note: Data used in this report are provisional and are subject to revision.

For more information, or to be included on the mailing list, please contact:

Colorado Basin River Forecast Center
2242 W North Temple
Salt Lake City, UT 84116
(801) 524-5130
www.cbrfc.noaa.gov


Hydrologist: G. Smith