sshGreat Basin Water Supply Outlook, June 1, 2008

Great Basin Water Supply Outlook, June 1, 2008

Note: This publication is scheduled for revision. If you have feedback on content, format, or publication frequency, please contact us.
Prepared by Brent Bernard
NOAA, National Weather Service
Colorado Basin River Forecast Center
Salt Lake City, Utah
www.cbrfc.noaa.gov

Contents

Great Basin Summary

May provided near normal conditions throughout the Great Basin. Stream flows increased to above average for the latter half of the month after a cool start in May. Maximum temperatures were 3-5 degrees F below normal and daily mins were mostly normal. Consequently runoff was highly variable and below average except during a 4 day period from May 18-22, when temperatures reached the low 90's and runoff peaked, before it snowed again. Monthly precipitation for the Great Basin basin was 96% of average with seasonal precipitation at 93% of average. The snowpack is nearly gone except on due north slopes and areas above 9000 feet where pockets of late season snow still exist. SNOTEL stations from these sites report a basin total of 101% of average.

Short term weather guidance from National Weather Service models shows a low pressure system bringing rain and snow too the area starting on June 4, which will again cool temperatures to below normal and slow the runoff before it picks up again. This is a continuation of what we've been experiencing for the last 2 months. Longer range temperature forecast call for above average probabilities of below normal conditions through the 6 to 10 day period. Most streams in the area, with the exception of the Big and Little Cottonwood creeks and the American Fork river have already peaked, reducing the threat of flooding. Of course, a heavy rain even could again raise the threat during the next several weeks. Most streams will now begin a slow decline toward their summer base flows conditions after a brief rise during the next 2 weeks.

Volumetric forecasts for the Great Basin decreased slightly again this month and now range from 64% at Deer Creek Reservoir to 128% percent of average for Chalk Creek at Coalville. The average forecast from 32 forecast points was 92% of the 1971-2000 average.



*Median of forecasts within each basin.


Bear Basin Conditions

Conditions across the Bear River Basin were normal for the month of May. Snowpack are nearly gone in the Bear but at a few location still show 107% of average. Snow is currently melting at a rate of 1 to 1.5 inches a day and will be completely gone within a week or two. Monthly precipitation was 107% of average while seasonal numbers rose slightly to 92% of average. Streamflows at Bear Utah-Wyoming State Line was 101% of average last month and only 65% of average for the Logan River Near Logan. Large swings of temperature were responsible for this disparity as the higher elevation regions were colder than average for the majority of the month. Forecasts in the Bear ranged from 47% at Stewart Dam near Montpelier (observed flow forecast) to 96% at the Utah-Wyoming State Line.



* Percent usable capacity, not percent average contents.
Click for multi-month Graph.

Weber Basin Conditions

The Weber and Ogden River basins received below average precipitation for the month of May. Monthly precipitation was recorded at 76% of average and seasonal precipitation dropped to 94% of average. Snow water equivalent numbers are 110% of average, however 10 of the 16 stations now have no snow and may not really represent what we consider normal conditions. Streamflows were 98% of average for the Weber at Oakley and 93% of average for Pineview Reservoir. Most snow now lies above 8500 feet and is diminishing rapidly. The April through July volume forecasts range from 72% of average at Lost Creek Reservoir near Croydon to 143% of average at Wheeler Creek near Huntsville.



* Percent usable capacity, not percent average contents.
Click for multi-month Graph.

Six Creeks Basin Conditions

Monthly precipitation over the Six Creeks drainages was below average for May at 85% of average. Seasonal precipitation totals dropped to 98% of average as a result. Indexed snow numbers for Six Creeks remains much above average at 178%, however the areal extent is very small now and confined to the uppermost elevations, skewing the meaning of this standard measure. Steamflow in Big Cottonwood Creek near Salt Lake City was 75% of average and never really reach average flow numbers due to the below average maximum temperatures during the month of May and are likely to rise once temperatures return to normal, however we do not expect high peaks with the current extent of snow cover. April through July volume forecasts range from 78% percent of average at Parley's near Salt Lake City to 108% percent of average for Little Cottonwood Creek near Salt Lake City.



* Percent usable capacity, not percent average contents.
Click for multi-month Graph.

Utah Lake Basin Conditions

Monthly precipitation for Utah Lake Basin was 99% of average and seasonal precipitation totals 100% of average. Currently the indexed snow for the Utah Lake Basin is 146% of average. This months SWE values are much the same as last month but because of the delayed melt, the daily averages appear to be going up which is not the case. This is not really a representation of building snow but more of how cool our temperatures have been this spring at the upper elevations. Forecasts for Utah Lake ranged from 64% at Deer Creek Reservoir to 100% for the American Fork near the UP Power Plant, American Fork Canyon.



* Percent usable capacity, not percent average contents.
Click for multi-month Graph.


Bear Specific Site Forecasts (kaf)

Click site name for graph.
Forecast
Period
90%
Exceedance
Volume
50%
Exceedance
Volume
Percent
Average
10%
Exceedance
Volume
Bear
UtahApril-July9010795139
June-July41679685
Woodruff Narrows Res April-July6111778167
June-July7.7555196
Big Ck
Randolph, Nr April-July1.82.9595.4
June-July0.651.7754.8
Smiths Fork
Border, Nr April-July56777594
June-July33528565
Bear
Montpelier, Nr, Stewart Dam, Blo April-July608034175
June-July20524782
Logan
Logan, Nr, State Dam, Abv April-July759777110
June-July39659375
Blacksmith Fork
Hyrum, Nr, Upnl Dam, Abv April-July14.8357353
June-July6.3157522


Weber Specific Site Forecasts (kaf)

Click site name for graph.
Forecast
Period
90%
Exceedance
Volume
50%
Exceedance
Volume
Percent
Average
10%
Exceedance
Volume
Weber
Oakley, Nr April-July8711190129
June-July43699789
Rockport Res, Wanship, Nr April-July7811787146
June-July35709795
Coalville, Nr April-July8511382140
June-July57608663
Chalk Ck
Coalville April-July26449862
June-July9.92212834
Weber
Echo Res, Echo, At April-July12717296215
June-July377388109
Lost Ck
Lost Ck Res, Croydon, Nr April-July6.6137419.4
June-July1.73.3725.9
East Canyon Ck
East Canyon Res, Morgan, Nr April-July223310644
June-July5.61010614
Weber
Gateway April-July20531589425
June-July66130103194
Sf Ogden
Huntsville, Nr April-July38538368
June-July6.1148622
Ogden
Pineview Res, Ogden, Nr April-July7311083147
June-July4.3258346
Wheeler Ck
Huntsville, Nr April-July4.66.2987.8
June-July0.931435


Six Creeks Specific Site Forecasts (kaf)

Click site name for graph.
Forecast
Period
90%
Exceedance
Volume
50%
Exceedance
Volume
Percent
Average
10%
Exceedance
Volume
Little Cottonwood Ck
Salt Lake City, Nr April-July27369045
June-July222810834
Big Cottonwood Ck
Salt Lake City, Nr April-July19338748
June-July14.42110028
Mill Ck
Salt Lake City, Nr April-July3.55.4777.3
June-July2.23.3924.4
Dell Fk
Little Dell Res April-July45.4796.9
June-July0.311.6952.9
Parleys Ck
Salt Lake City, Nr April-July510.26115.4
June-July2.64.5784.4
Emigration Ck
Salt Lake City, Nr April-July1.42.1473
June-July0.121811.9
City Ck
Salt Lake City, Nr April-July3.76.6769.5
June-July1.84956.2
Vernon Ck
Vernon, Nr April-June0.681.4952.1
June-July0.130.5881.2
S Willow Ck
Grantsville, Nr April-July1.53.31035.1
June-July0.61.7943.5


Utah Lake Specific Site Forecasts (kaf)

Click site name for graph.
Forecast
Period
90%
Exceedance
Volume
50%
Exceedance
Volume
Percent
Average
10%
Exceedance
Volume
Spanish Fork
Castilla, Nr April-July24617996
June-July5259648
Provo
Woodland, Nr April-July759895116
June-July30479064
Hailstone, Nr April-July7910596131
June-July22448366
Deer Ck Res April-July8811591142
June-July18.1426466
American Fork
American Fork, Nr, Up Pwrplnt, AbvApril-July19278435
June-July142010026
Jordan
Utah Lake, Provo, Nr April-July20030092400
June-July3211090188

Differences between the full period forecasts and the residual forecasts may not exactly equal the actual observed volumes due to rounding conventions (see Definitions section).

Great Basin Reservoir Contents (kaf)

Usable
Capacity
EOM
Contents
Percent
Usable
Capacity
Last Year
EOM
Last Year
%Capacity
untitled Bear
Woodruff Narrows Res 55.8 56.0 100 57.3 103
untitled Bear Lake
Lifton, St. Charles, Nr 1302.0 355.3 27 531.6 41
untitled Little Bear
Hyrum Res Abv 15.3 15.4 101 14.9 98
untitled Willard Reservoir Storage
215.0 80.1 37 90.8 42
untitled Sf Ogden
Causey Res 7.1 7.2 101 7.1 100
untitled Ogden
Pineview Res, Ogden, Nr 110.1 112.0 102 0.0 0
untitled Lost Ck
Lost Ck Res, Croydon, Nr 22.5 22.6 100 19.4 86
untitled Weber
Rockport Res, Wanship, Nr 60.9 55.0 90 56.1 92
Echo Res, Echo, At 73.9 73.9 100 67.3 91
untitled East Canyon Ck
East Canyon Res, Morgan, Nr 49.5 49.5 100 48.9 99
untitled Jordanelle Dam
311.0 273.5 88 315.0 101
untitled Provo
Deer Ck Res 149.7 76.0 51 149.0 100
untitled Jordan
Utah Lake, Provo, Nr 870.9 855.0 98 936.3 108
untitled
TOTAL 3243.7 2031.5 63 2293.7 71

Precipitation Maps




Definitions

10% exceedance forecast: Given the current hydrometeorological conditions, i.e current snowpack, soil moisture and streamflow, the volume that has a 10% chance of being exceeded. Previously referred to as "Reasonable Maximum Forecast".

50% exceedance forecast: Given the current hydrometeorological conditions, i.e current snowpack, soil moisture and streamflow, the volume that has a 50% chance of being exceeded. Previously referred to as "Most Probable Forecast".

90% exceedance forecast: Given the current hydrometeorological conditions, i.e current snowpack, soil moisture and streamflow, the volume that has a 90% chance of being exceeded. Previously referred to as "Reasonable Minimum Forecast".

Acre-Foot (af): The volume equal to one acre covered one foot deep (43,560 cubic feet). See kaf below.

Average: The arithmetic mean. The sum of the values divided by the number of values. Values from 1971-2000 are used for this publication.

Categories: Much Above Average=Greater than 130%, Above Average=111-130%, Near Average=90-110%, Below Average=70-89%, Much Below Average=Less than 70%.

CBRFC: Colorado Basin River Forecast Center.

Forecast Period: The period from April 1 through July 31, unless otherwise noted.

kaf: Thousand Acre-Feet. See Acre-Foot above.

Inflow: The volume of water that flows into a reservoir or lake.

Median: The middle value of an ordered set of values. Half of the values are higher and half of the values are lower. When the set contains an even number of values the median is the average of the two middle numbers.

NOAA: National Oceanic and Atomospheric Administration.

NWS: National Weather Service.

Rounding Conventions:
RangeRound to
0-1.990.01
2.0-19.90.1
20-1991.0
200-9995.0
1000+3 significant digits


Streamflow: The volume of water that flows past a specific stream site.

Water Year: The 12-month period, October 1 through September 30. The water year is designated by the calendar year in which it ends. Thus, the year ending September 30, 2008, is called the "2008 water year."


Additional Information

Water supply forecasts take into consideration present hydrometeorological conditions and use average basin temperatures and precipitation for the forecast period. As the forecast season progresses, a greater portion of the future hydrologic and climatic uncertainty becomes known and monthly forecasts become more accurate. For more information on the tools we use, consult Water Supply Forecasting Tools.

Volume forecasts represent adjusted flows; that is, observed flows with upstream water use taken into account. Adjusted flows will closely approximate natural or unimpaired flows. However, not all upstream diversions or impoundments are measured or quantifiable. For specific adjustments used with each forecast point, consult the Guide to Water Supply Forecasting.

The Water Supply Outlook is issued monthly January through May by the Colorado Basin River Forecast Center. It represents a coordinated effort between the National Weather Service, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Geological Survey and local water district managers.

Note: Data used in this report are provisional and are subject to revision.

For more information, or to be included on the mailing list, please contact:

Colorado Basin River Forecast Center
2242 W North Temple
Salt Lake City, UT 84116
(801) 524-5130
www.cbrfc.noaa.gov


Hydrologist: Brent Bernard